·科技·
B2

Reddit Takes Australia's Under-16 Social Media Ban to Court

Reddit就澳洲16歲以下社群媒體禁令提告

#Australia#social media#Reddit#law#technology
0:00 / 0:00

Nearly eleven months after Australia banned under-16s from major social media platforms—resulting in more than five million suspended accounts—the landmark law faces its first major test in the High Court. Reddit and a digital rights advocacy group are challenging the restrictions, arguing that cutting young people off from digital platforms unfairly limits their ability to take part in political debate.

resulting in= 分詞構文,用來引出前述行動所導致的直接結果(「導致……、造成……」)cutting young people off from= 將特定群體與某種服務或環境完全隔絕或切斷聯繫

Under the rules, ten major services including Reddit, TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram must deactivate accounts belonging to children under 16. Because Australia's constitution does not guarantee an explicit right to free speech, the legal challenge relies on a legal doctrine known as the implied freedom of political communication. Reddit argued in court filings that its platform serves as a vital source of news and public discussion, pointing out that teenagers can no longer participate in question-and-answer sessions with politicians or engage with the youth wings of political parties.

relies on= 以某項原則或依據作為論點的主要立足點(「依賴、依據……」)pointing out that= 在論述中明確指出某項關鍵事實或後果

In response, the federal government defended the legislation as a necessary measure to protect teenagers from online harms. Authorities argue that platforms rely on addictive features, such as recommendation algorithms, infinite scrolling feeds, and constant notifications, which pose risks to adolescent well-being. Adam Collins, Reddit's chief communications officer, stated that while the company supports protecting young people, "there are better, more effective ways to achieve it" than an outright age ban.

defended ... as= 將某項政策或做法定性為特定措施以進行辯護(「辯稱……為……」)pose risks to= 對某人或某事物的安全或健康構成潛在危險或威脅

The legal battle also highlights the practical challenges of enforcing the ban. While two teenagers originally joined the lawsuit, they withdrew over fears of facing massive legal costs, leaving the advocacy group to fight questions over whether it has proper legal standing to sue. At the same time, Australia's online safety regulator is investigating whether several tech giants are fully complying, with platforms facing potential fines of up to nearly 100 million Australian dollars if teenagers are still slipping through the restrictions.

over fears of= 出於對某種負面結果的擔憂或恐懼(「因擔憂……」)slipping through= 鑽過漏洞或穿過審查防線而未被察覺(「規避、漏過」)

學習筆記

文法整理

句型意思
resulting in分詞構文,用來引出前述行動所導致的直接結果(「導致……、造成……」)
cutting young people off from將特定群體與某種服務或環境完全隔絕或切斷聯繫
relies on以某項原則或依據作為論點的主要立足點(「依賴、依據……」)
pointing out that在論述中明確指出某項關鍵事實或後果
defended ... as將某項政策或做法定性為特定措施以進行辯護(「辯稱……為……」)
pose risks to對某人或某事物的安全或健康構成潛在危險或威脅
over fears of出於對某種負面結果的擔憂或恐懼(「因擔憂……」)
slipping through鑽過漏洞或穿過審查防線而未被察覺(「規避、漏過」)

詞彙整理

單字意思
landmark地標;可作為辨認位置或方向依據的醒目景物或建築物。
deactivate使停止運作或失去作用;停用。
legislation由立法機關制定並正式通過的法律;法案。
outright完全的;毫無保留或例外的
enforcing強制實施(法律、規定等),使其確實受到遵守或執行
legal standing在訴訟中,依法有資格提起訴訟或請求法院裁判的資格;訴訟資格。
complying遵守(規定、命令或要求);按照……辦理。

延伸學習

  • •澳洲憲法並沒有像美國憲法第一修正案那樣明文保障言論自由,而是由高等法院在1992年確立了「默示政治傳播自由」,視其為代議民主運作不可或缺的基礎。
  • •在法律用語中,「legal standing(當事人資格/起訴權)」指的是提起訴訟的當事人在法律上是否具備充分且直接的利害關係與資格。
  • •新聞英語中常見的「landmark law(具里程碑意義的法律)」,用來指稱具有開創性、樹立重要先例的重大立法。

練習

測試你剛學到的內容。

  1. In response, the federal government defended the   as a necessary measure to protect teenagers from online harms.

  2. Why is Reddit challenging Australia's social media ban in the High Court?

Source: The Guardian