·國際·
C1

Swiss Court Upholds Liberian Commander's Sentence but Strikes Crimes Against Humanity Charge

瑞士最高法院維持賴比瑞亞前指揮官刑期 但撤銷危害人類罪指控

#Liberia#Switzerland#war crimes#crimes against humanity#universal jurisdiction
0:00 / 0:00

Switzerland's supreme court has upheld a maximum 20-year prison sentence for former Liberian rebel commander Alieu Kosiah, cementing a landmark war-crimes ruling while throwing out a separate conviction for crimes against humanity on strict legal grounds. The Federal Supreme Court ruled that because crimes against humanity were only incorporated into Swiss law in 2011, the charge could not be applied retroactively to atrocities committed during the 1990s.

throwing out= 法律用語,指駁回某項指控或撤銷某項定罪。on strict legal grounds= 指判決完全基於嚴格的法律條文與法定解釋,而非道德上的評價。

The decision concludes a prolonged legal saga that began when Swiss authorities arrested Kosiah in 2014, years after he settled in the country in the late 1990s. In 2021, the Federal Criminal Court convicted the former United Liberation Movement of Liberia for Democracy commander of numerous atrocities carried out between 1993 and 1995 during the first of Liberia's back-to-back civil wars. An appeals chamber reaffirmed the 20-year sentence in 2023 and added the groundbreaking conviction for crimes against humanity—the first such finding in Swiss judicial history.

back-to-back= 形容詞,意為「連續的」或「接二連三的」,此處指賴比瑞亞接連爆發的兩次內戰。

Switzerland tried Kosiah under universal jurisdiction, a principle enabling domestic courts to prosecute core international crimes regardless of where the acts occurred. The high court affirmed his guilt for violating the laws of war, confirming findings that he ordered or participated in the killings of 17 civilians and two unarmed soldiers, as well as rape, the deployment of a child soldier, looting, and the cruel treatment of civilians and corpses. However, judges held that the legal principle of non-retroactivity barred prosecutors from applying a statute created long after the events took place.

regardless of where= 介系詞片語,意為「無論在何處」,表示管轄權的行使不受行為發生地點的限制。

Advocates for victims expressed mixed emotions over the split outcome. Swiss legal organization Civitas Maxima highlighted that the ruling makes final the first war-crimes conviction handed down by a Swiss civilian court, as well as the first conviction anywhere of a Liberian for wartime atrocities. Alain Werner, the organization's director and legal representative for the victims, welcomed the finality of the sentence for survivors while voicing deep disappointment over the dropped charge, maintaining that the systematic violence in Lofa County reflected the very definition of a crime against humanity.

handed down= 片語動詞,指法院正式宣告或下達判決。makes final= 使役結構(make + 受詞 + 形容詞),表示該裁決使有罪判決成為終局確定判決,無法再上訴。

學習筆記

文法整理

句型意思
throwing out法律用語,指駁回某項指控或撤銷某項定罪。
on strict legal grounds指判決完全基於嚴格的法律條文與法定解釋,而非道德上的評價。
back-to-back形容詞,意為「連續的」或「接二連三的」,此處指賴比瑞亞接連爆發的兩次內戰。
regardless of where介系詞片語,意為「無論在何處」,表示管轄權的行使不受行為發生地點的限制。
handed down片語動詞,指法院正式宣告或下達判決。
makes final使役結構(make + 受詞 + 形容詞),表示該裁決使有罪判決成為終局確定判決,無法再上訴。

詞彙整理

單字意思
landmark地標;可作為辨認位置或方向依據的醒目景物或建築物。
non-retroactivity不溯及既往(原則);指法律原則上不得適用於法律生效前已發生的事實或行為。
retroactively溯及既往地;追溯地(指法律、規定等適用於生效前已發生的事情)
systematic有系統的;有條理且按照一定計畫或步驟進行的
universal jurisdiction普遍管轄權;指一國法院得不論犯罪行為發生地或行為人、被害人的國籍,對特定重大國際犯罪行使審判權的原則。

延伸學習

  • •「普遍管轄權」(universal jurisdiction)是一項國際法原則,允許各國國內法院針對滅絕種族罪、戰爭罪等核心國際罪行進行追訴,即使犯罪發生在國外且行為人或受害人均為外國人亦同。
  • •在國際人道法中,「危害人類罪」(crimes against humanity)通常要求針對平民人口進行廣泛或系統性的攻擊,這在構成要件上不同於個別的「戰爭罪」(war crimes)。
  • •「不溯及既往原則」(non-retroactivity / 罪刑法定原則)是現代刑法的基石,禁止司法機關依據事後制定的法律來追訴既往行為。

練習

測試你剛學到的內容。

  1. Switzerland tried Kosiah under  , a principle enabling domestic courts to prosecute core international crimes regardless of where the acts occurred.

  2. Why did the Federal Supreme Court overturn the conviction for crimes against humanity?

Source: Al Jazeera